SEC Adopts Rule to Enhance Municpal Securities Disclosure
Wednesday, May 26th, 2010The Securities and Exchange Commision (SEC) voted to approve rule changes that improve the qualifty and timeliness of municipal securities disclosure. Municipal securities, such as municipal bonds, are exempt from the disclosure requirements of the federal securities laws. However, the SEC adopted Rule 15c2-12 in 1989, which was designed to foster greater transparency in the municipal securities market, by regulating those who underwrite, or sell, municipal securities. Today the SEC passed an amendment to Rule 15c-12. The amended rule:
- is expanded to apply to new issuances of VRDO securities.VRDOs bear interest at a rate that is reset periodically and investors are able to sell them back to the issuer at certain times for their full value.
- improves disclosure of tax risk. The amended rule will specifically include disclosure of events that may adversely affect a bond’s tax exemption, including issuance by the IRS of proposed and final decisions about whether the bond can be taxed.
- strengthens and expands disclosure of important events. The amended rule increases the number of events deemed important that should be disclosed to include: (1) tender offers; (2) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar proceeding; (3) mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person or their termination, if material; and (4) appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of the name of a trustee, if material. Under the existing rule, an underwriter must have a reasonable belief that the state or local government that issued municipal bonds has agreed to provide ongoing, continuing disclosure of certain important events.
- establishes a more specific filing deadline. The amended rule will provide that notices of the events listed in the rule be disclosed in a timely manner not more than 10 business days after the event. Currently, the rule simply provides for disclosure ‘in a timely manner.’
- provides additional guidance. The amended release reaffirms that, to have a reasonable basis to recommend a security, a municipal underwriter must carefully evaluate the likelihood that a municipality will make the ongoing disclosure called for by the amended rule. The adopting release further states that it is doubtful that an underwriter could form a reasonable basis to recommend a security if the municipality had a history of persistent and material non-disclosure.


