AFP Blogs

AFP General, Corp Finance, Payments & Annual Conference Blogs

 

Archive for the ‘Regulations & Compliance’ Category

This Week in Accounting and Financial Reporting 2/14/2011

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

FASB

Hedge Accounting

This week the FASB issued a Discussion Paper to solicit input on how to improve, simplify, and converge the financial reporting requirements for hedging activities.  As you may recall, back in December we issued a comment letter to the FASB on their proposed hedge accounting requirements.   We are in the process of issuing a comment letter to the IASB on their proposed hedge requirements.  That comment letter is due to the IASB by March 9th.  The Discussion (more…)

This Week in Accounting and Financial Reporting (2/4/2011)

Friday, February 4th, 2011

AFP

Our organization has been very vocal in stating our views on the proposed lease accounting changes.  In December we issued a comment letter to the FASB/IASB citing our concerns.   Subsequently, I attended one of the leasing roundtables held at the FASB headquarters in Norwalk where the FASB and IASB members listened to constituents discuss the pros and cons to the proposed standards, and worked with the Boards on devising alternative views that might also be considered.  As a result of our efforts, we were quoted in the following news publication:  http://www.imakenews.com/epi_hfco/e_article001993007.cfm?x=bhRGDKk,b9WD2Q9r,w

On March 3rd, AFP will host a webinar on  the US and International rules proposed for hedge accounting this is currently out for comment given my Sylvie Monett-Houle, a partner at KPMG.    This webinar will discuss the pros and cons of the proposed changes, and how such changes may affect a company’s ability to manage its  risk exposure.  It (more…)

This Week in Accounting 1/21/11

Friday, January 21st, 2011

FASB

 On Tuesday, January 25, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. EST, the FASB will host a one-hour webcast, 2011 Chairman’s Outlook on the FASB, with FASB Chairman Leslie F. Seidman who will discuss the Board’s priorities for 2011, including updates on top projects and progress on its joint agenda with the International Accounting Standards Board.  The webcast is free of charge but you must preregister at FASB’s website at www.fasb.org. (more…)

Accounting Update

Friday, January 14th, 2011

FASB

The FASB and the IASB originally published separate proposals on credit impairment of financial assets. Although both boards proposed moving to a more forward-looking approach to accounting for impairment they proposed different models. (more…)

A Didactic Look at FASB Exposure Draft on Hedge Accounting

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Join AFP today at 3:30 pm E.T. for webinar entitled, “Treasurers and Controllers Look to FASB Exposure Draft for Hedge Accounting Relief.” Derivative accounting and its implications on corporate hedge programs has been a hot topic for most of the past 10 years, and this year is no exception with the FASB’s recent Exposure Draft of changes to Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Treasury and accounting organizations need to explore the implications of the proposal on existing hedge programs, processes and audits, before the comment deadline of September 30, 2010. Learn what the exposure draft offers to corporate hedge programs and understand what it is taking away.  Our webinar presenter is Helen Kane, President of Hedge Trackers, LLC. For more information on viewing the webinar visit AFP’s Education Marketplace.

Last Week in Accounting and Financial Reporting

Monday, July 19th, 2010

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

 This week I attended the PCAOB’s Standards Advisory Group (SAG) Meeting.  The topics discussed were (1) broker dealer audit considerations; (2) FASB/IASB projects and potential impact on auditors; (3) subsequent events; (4) auditors reporting framework; and (5) communications with audit committees.  (more…)

Accounting Standards Update Issued on Amendments for Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released on their website an Exposure Draft (ED) of a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) intended to develop common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). AFP will be reviewing this ED and making a decision on whether to issue a comment letter on behalf of our members in the upcoming weeks. Feel free to reach out to our staff should you have any issues with the propoasl.

The proposed ASU sets forth amendments that the Boards believe would improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments would apply to all reporting entities that are required or permitted to measure or disclose the fair value of an asset, a liability, or an instrument classified in shareholders’ equity in the financial statements.

The IASB is publishing a measurement uncertainty analysis disclosure proposal, Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Disclosure for Fair Value Measurements, which is the same as a proposed disclosure requirement in the proposed Update

The comment period for the proposed ASU extends through September 7, 2010. The ED is available at www.fasb.org.

Supreme Court Rules in Case Questioning PCAOB Constitutionality

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

The Supreme Court held that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s provisions making PCAOB Board members removable by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) only for good cause were inconsistent with the Constitution’s separation of powers. However, the operation of the PCAOB will not be interrupted. The courts rectified this inconsistency by changing the SEC’s power to language that now states that the SEC can remove a PCAOB Board member “at will” rather than “for good cause.” All other aspects of the PCAOB’s structure and design remains unchanged including registration, inspection, enforcement, and standard-setting activities.

US and Canadian Securities Exchanges Sign Cross Border Agreement

Monday, June 14th, 2010

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Quebec Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) today announced a comprehensive arrangement to facilitate their supervision of regulated entities that operate across the U.S.-Canadian border. SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro, AMF President and CEO Jean St-Gelais and OSC Chair David Wilson executed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that provides a clear mechanism for consultation, cooperation, and exchange of information among the SEC, AMF and OSC in the context of supervision.

The MOU sets forth the terms and conditions for the sharing of information about regulated entities, such as broker-dealers and investment advisers, which operate in the U.S., Quebec and Ontario.This MOU is the first comprehensive supervisory MOU to be signed by the SEC since the start of the financial crisis. The SEC currently has comprehensive supervisory MOUs with the securities regulators in the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia.

IOSCO Adds Eight New Principles to Strengthen Global Securities Regulation

Monday, June 14th, 2010

The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) added eight new principles to its list of thirty principles of securities regulation in response to the lessons learned from the credit crisis. The eight new principles cover specific policy areas such as hedge funds, credit rating agencies and auditor independence and oversight, in addition to broader areas including monitoring, mitigating and managing systemic risk; and requiring that conflicts of interest and misalignment of incentives are avoided, eliminated, disclosed or otherwise managed. Among the new principles added is a systemic risk principle that recognizes the need for Regulators to be conscious of systemic risk and the role they play in relation to it.

IOSCO is recognized as the leading international policy forum for securities regulators. The organization’s membership regulates more than 95% of the world’s securities markets in over 100 jurisdictions. The US Securities and Exchange Commission is currently a member. The 38 principles set forth by IOSCO are based on objectives that seek to:

  1. protect investors
  2. ensure that markets are fair, efficient and transparent; and
  3. reduce systemic risk.

 

The 38 principles are grouped in nine categories. The bolded principles are the ones that have been added.

A. Principles Relating to the Regulator

 

1. The responsibilities of the Regulator should be clear and objectively stated.

2. The Regulator should be operationally independent and accountable in the exercise of its functions and powers.

3. The Regulator should have adequate powers, proper resources and the capacity to perform its functions and exercise its powers.

4. The Regulator should adopt clear and consistent regulatory processes.

5. The staff of the Regulator should observe the highest professional standards, including appropriate standards of confidentiality.

6. The Regulator should have or contribute to a process to monitor, mitigate and manage systemic risk, appropriate to its mandate.

7. The Regulator should have or contribute to a process to review the perimeter of regulation regularly.

8. The Regulator should seek to ensure that conflicts of interest and misalignment of incentives are avoided, eliminated, disclosed or otherwise managed.

B. Principles for Self-Regulation

9. Where the regulatory system makes use of Self-Regulatory Organizations (SROs) that exercise some direct oversight responsibility for their respective areas of competence, such SROs should be subject to the oversight of the Regulator and should observe standards of fairness and confidentiality when exercising powers and delegated responsibilities.

C. Principles for the Enforcement of Securities Regulation

10. The Regulator should have comprehensive inspection, investigation and surveillance powers.

11. The Regulator should have comprehensive enforcement powers.

12. The regulatory system should ensure an effective and credible use of inspection, investigation, surveillance and enforcement powers and implementation of an effective compliance program.

D. Principles for Cooperation in Regulation

13. The Regulator should have authority to share both public and non-public information with domestic and foreign counterparts.

14. Regulators should establish information sharing mechanisms that set out when and how they will share both public and non-public information with their domestic and foreign counterparts.

15. The regulatory system should allow for assistance to be provided to foreign Regulators who need to make inquiries in the discharge of their functions and exercise of their powers.

E. Principles for Issuers

16. There should be full, accurate and timely disclosure of financial results, risk and other information which is material to investors’ decisions.

17. Holders of securities in a company should be treated in a fair and equitable manner.

18. Accounting standards used by issuers to prepare financial statements should be of a high and internationally acceptable quality.

F. Principles for Auditors, Credit Ratings Agencies, and other information service providers

19. Auditors should be subject to adequate levels of oversight. 21. Audit standards should be of a high and internationally acceptable quality.

22. Credit rating agencies should be subject to adequate levels of oversight. The regulatory system should ensure that credit rating agencies whose ratings are used for regulatory purposes are subject to registration and ongoing supervision. G. Principles for Collective Investment Schemes

23. Other entities that offer investors analytical or evaluative services should be subject to oversight and regulation appropriate to the impact their activities have on the market or the degree to which the regulatory system relies on them.

24. The regulatory system should set standards for the eligibility, governance, organization and operational conduct of those who wish to market or operate a collective investment scheme.

25. The regulatory system should provide for rules governing the legal form and structure of collective investment schemes and the segregation and protection of client assets.

26. Regulation should require disclosure, as set forth under the principles for issuers, which is necessary to evaluate the suitability of a collective investment scheme for a particular investor and the value of the investor’s interest in the scheme.

27. Regulation should ensure that there is a proper and disclosed basis for asset valuation and the pricing and the redemption of units in a collective investment scheme.

28. Regulation should ensure that hedge funds and/or hedge funds managers/advisers are subject to appropriate oversight.

H. Principles for Market Intermediaries

29. Regulation should provide for minimum entry standards for market intermediaries.

30. There should be initial and ongoing capital and other prudential requirements for market intermediaries that reflect the risks that the intermediaries undertake.

31. Market intermediaries should be required to establish an internal function that delivers compliance with standards for internal organization and operational conduct, with the aim of protecting the interests of clients and their assets and ensuring proper management of risk, through which management of the intermediary accepts primary responsibility for these matters.

32. There should be procedures for dealing with the failure of a market intermediary in order to minimize damage and loss to investors and to contain systemic risk.

I. Principles for Secondary Markets

33. The establishment of trading systems including securities exchanges should be subject to regulatory authorization and oversight.

34. There should be ongoing regulatory supervision of exchanges and trading systems which should aim to ensure that the integrity of trading is maintained through fair and equitable rules that strike an appropriate balance between the demands of different market participants.

35. Regulation should promote transparency of trading.

36. Regulation should be designed to detect and deter manipulation and other unfair trading practices.

37. Regulation should aim to ensure the proper management of large exposures, default risk and market disruption.

38. Securities settlement systems and central counterparties should be subject to regulatory and supervisory requirements that are designed to ensure that they are fair, effective and efficient and that they reduce systemic risk