Treasury Benchmarking Survey Expands to Europe
Thursday, October 22nd, 2009Interested in comparing your performance to your corporate treasury peers in Europe? The second annual AFP Treasury Benchmarking Survey for the first time includes data from European corporate treasurers. This year’s participants included members of AFP as well as subscribers to London-based gtnews, an AFP company and on-line resource for the treasury and finance community, doubling respondents to this year’s survey to more than 800 organizations. AFP, IBM and Deutsche Bank collaborated on the 2009 AFP Treasury Benchmarking Survey.
According to the survey, deploying automated systems can reduce cycle times and staffing requirements, especially for cash management activities.
Additional findings include:
Treasury Costs – The smaller the organization, the more intensive the investment is for treasury operations relative to revenue. Also, the financial services industry tends to incur the highest level of FTEs and costs. This is likely due to the regulatory requirements and strategic emphasis on cash management. In other words, financial services organizations view treasury as a competitive differentiator.
Full-Time Treasury Equivalents - The smaller the organization, the more FTEs are required to conduct treasury operations relative to revenue. The financial services industry tends to employ higher FTE levels.
Treasury Cycle Times - With a few exceptions, size is not a significant predictor of cycle time, suggesting that size does indicate overall complexity when other factors are constant. Financial services tend to have lower average and benchmark cycle times than those of other industry groups.
You can download the executive summary of the 2009 AFP Treasury Benchmarking Survey.



